
Teachers, of course, need to be held accountabl
e. We can't have teachers browsing the internet, talking on the phone, etc. when they should be dedicating their time during the school day to improving the academic lives of their students. However, this standardiz
ed testing movement has gone too far and there are too many people who don't understand the value of these tests. There is myriad research that shows that these tests are unreliable
, not valid measures of student knowledge, and they do not help improve instructio
n. Yet, the public believes that teachers are trying to slack off at their jobs, that they just want free pay, and that the union doesn't care about students.
Teachers want to be held accountabl
e in ways that actually mean something: asess how well their students write, read, think, solve problems, create, communicat
e, innovate, understand
, and relate effectivel
y with the content. Instead of using a value-adde
d number that is meaningles
s to the students and that has no consequenc
e in the students' academic life, let's create an evaluation system that uses the students' actual work, what they can actually do and perform, as a significan
t portion that measures the teachers' effectiven
ess. And, more importantl
y, let's use a measure that accounts for student growth so that the teachers in the poorest schools have a fair chance at being evaluated as highly effective if their students have significan
t and measureabl
e improvemen
t in their knowledge and skills. This way, the measuremen
t is actually assessing what matters: student learning.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost